<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Questioning Shidemn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitalreason.wordpress.com/2008/05/10/questioning-shidemn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitalreason.wordpress.com/2008/05/10/questioning-shidemn/</link>
	<description>Toward a consistent, logical worldview.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: bruisescolours</title>
		<link>http://digitalreason.wordpress.com/2008/05/10/questioning-shidemn/#comment-544</link>
		<dc:creator>bruisescolours</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 16:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalreason.wordpress.com/?p=34#comment-544</guid>
		<description>Reading this post was quite illuminating and interesting.  The issue of relativistic worldviews brought up towards the end is one that always fascinates me.  I do think there is a difference between relativism or post modernism (I'm not trying to split hairs and the two seem to be on close intellectual ground) and recognizing that there can be absolute truth even if it may be impossible for us to discover it or simply that we may not know it at the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading this post was quite illuminating and interesting.  The issue of relativistic worldviews brought up towards the end is one that always fascinates me.  I do think there is a difference between relativism or post modernism (I&#8217;m not trying to split hairs and the two seem to be on close intellectual ground) and recognizing that there can be absolute truth even if it may be impossible for us to discover it or simply that we may not know it at the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
